Welcome to my channel, and remember, box seats are still available on Twitter, @JohnnyRagadoo. I was briefly put in time out on Sleeping Warrior's channel for a comment I made to Nathan Oakley, who was also in the chat room. He called somebody an idiot. I offered, "You call others idiots, but you claimed velocity and acceleration were the same thing!"
He asked for a citation that he would say such a thing. I promised a video so he made me go stand in the corner. Nathan's comment was, "You Make no mention of the two things you claim in your quote. Take 5, get a better quote and cite where you got it fool."
Oh, well, I knew that corner well, back in third grade.
Anyway, that thunderclap you felt rather than heard was my decision to take extreme measures. Quantum Eraser scrambled velocity, acceleration, mass, inertia, and molar units into an unhealthy omelette, and I felt I had to release the power of limerick itself. It was a terrible decision to make, but I had to do it.
I unleashed the doggerel of war.
Someone insightful once said that an infinitely variable universe would lead to observations of anything, if one were to look long enough. For an example of something that wise fellow never anticipated, please visit Quantum Eraser's channel for his analysis of velocity and acceleration, mass and mole, and mass and inertia -
Mr. Oakley, here's your citation. You and QE share the spotlight starting at about 2:50. Your statements about the alleged congruence of velocity and acceleration are at 3:37, but please watch the whole presentation. It's not long and I believe you'll find it a fun look at how tightly math relates to the real world.
Shutterstock images used by permission. NASA's images appearing here are graciously in the public domain.
Background music is Island by extenz
Creative Commons — Attribution 3.0 Unported — CC BY 3.0
Free Download / Stream:
Music promoted by Audio Library
0 Comments