The US has reversed its four-decade policy on Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank by saying it no longer considers them inconsistent with international law. The latest in a series of concessions to Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration said it was “reversing the Obama administration’s approach towards Israeli settlements”. In a televised appearance at the US state department, Mike Pompeo, the secretary of state, said: “The establishment of Israeli civilian settlements is not, per se, inconsistent with international law.” The building of Jewish settlements on territory historically occupied by the Palestinians has been repeatedly condemned by the international community, and is the subject of several resolutions by the United Nations. As recently as 2016, the UN security council passed resolution 2334, which denounced the establishment of settlements in Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, as having “no legal validity” and constituting “a flagrant violation under international law and a major obstacle to the vision of two states living side-by-side in peace and security, within internationally recognised borders”. Mr Pompeo suggested the position of the US towards the West Bank, which Israel captured during a 1967 war, had changed over the years, even if Washington’s official policy had not altered for 40 years. He said while Democratic president Jimmy Carter in 1978 found they were not consistent with international law, Republican Ronald Reagan in 1981 said he did not view them as inherently illegal. Hagit Ofran, from Peace Now, an Israeli settlement watchdog, told The Independent: “[Pompeo] might as well say that the day is night but it will not change the fact that settlements are a violation of the international law. But even more important than their legal status, settlements are bad for Israel, bad for the chances for peace and bad for the stability of the region. “America is turning its back on the two states solution, and is paving the way for the Israeli government to move forward with annexation plans and making the one-state reality more permanent.” A spokesperson for Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas said the move by Washington “contradicts totally with international law”. Dror Etkes, an Israeli researcher who has spent two decades monitoring the Israeli settlement enterprise and heads up watchdog Kerem Navot, said: “No wonder that the secretary of state who denies climate change and opposed affordable healthcare and voted against public funding for abortions, supports that the Israeli settlement/apartheid in the West Bank.” The move by Washington counts as the latest major policy shift in regard to Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories by the Trump administration. In late 2017, Mr Trump announced the United States’ recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and ordered that the US embassy more there from Te
Mike Pompeo,Israel,West Bank,Donald Trump,Benjamin Netanyahu,Barack Obama,Benny Gantz,US politics,Americas,World,News,
The US has reversed its four-decade policy on Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank by saying it no longer considers them inconsistent with international law. The latest in a series of concessions to Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration said it was “reversing the Obama administration’s approach towards Israeli settlements”. In a televised appearance at the US state department, Mike Pompeo, the secretary of state, said: “The establishment of Israeli civilian settlements is not, per se, inconsistent with international law.” The building of Jewish settlements on territory historically occupied by the Palestinians has been repeatedly condemned by the international community, and is the subject of several resolutions by the United Nations. As recently as 2016, the UN security council passed resolution 2334, which denounced the establishment of settlements in Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, as having “no legal validity” and constituting “a flagrant violation under international law and a major obstacle to the vision of two states living side-by-side in peace and security, within internationally recognised borders”. Mr Pompeo suggested the position of the US towards the West Bank, which Israel captured during a 1967 war, had changed over the years, even if Washington’s official policy had not altered for 40 years. He said while Democratic president Jimmy Carter in 1978 found they were not consistent with international law, Republican Ronald Reagan in 1981 said he did not view them as inherently illegal. Hagit Ofran, from Peace Now, an Israeli settlement watchdog, told The Independent: “[Pompeo] might as well say that the day is night but it will not change the fact that settlements are a violation of the international law. But even more important than their legal status, settlements are bad for Israel, bad for the chances for peace and bad for the stability of the region. “America is turning its back on the two states solution, and is paving the way for the Israeli government to move forward with annexation plans and making the one-state reality more permanent.” A spokesperson for Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas said the move by Washington “contradicts totally with international law”. Dror Etkes, an Israeli researcher who has spent two decades monitoring the Israeli settlement enterprise and heads up watchdog Kerem Navot, said: “No wonder that the secretary of state who denies climate change and opposed affordable healthcare and voted against public funding for abortions, supports that the Israeli settlement/apartheid in the West Bank.” The move by Washington counts as the latest major policy shift in regard to Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories by the Trump administration. In late 2017, Mr Trump announced the United States’ recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and ordered that the US embassy more there from Te
0 Comments